Wednesday, February 22, 2012

血濃於水還是淡如水?


上星期日,我到大埔進行要求擱置自駕遊及暫停雙非孕婦來港產子名額的簽名運動。一位略帶鄉音的中年女士走到我面前,瞪著眼說: 「為甚麼你們要歧視內地同胞?」我正想回應,她已氣沖沖地跑了。社會政策竟淪為分化中港的源頭是特區的悲哀,也是港人的悲哀!

首先必須說明,入境限制是每個國家或地域必須有的,而進入其他國家或地域亦非基本人權。每個自治地方必須要以當地之公帑作為維持本土居民福利的基礎。若本土的醫療或福利制度本身已不能應付本土居民需要,外來者加入競爭只會令貧乏的社會資源進一步惡化,受損害的只會是本土居民,因為外來人士永遠擁有享用自身國度內福利的選擇權。所以本土居民遷怒於外來人士是可以理解的。

這些矛盾是否可以避免?答案當然是可以的。就以產科服務為例,特區政府過去十年因應人口出生率遞減,早已實行不斷削減產科服務的政策。無論在醫療設施或護理人員的需求上,政府均採取宜少不宜多的態度。但社會是會改變的。市民積極回應特首公開呼籲多生貴子、內地經濟飛騰、久為詬病的一孩政策及優質醫療制度的需求皆是導致特區產科服務需求激增的主要原因。可惜特區政府依然故我,不願增加醫療設施和資源,卻又堅持每年三萬五千名內地孕婦來港產子的名額。這樣的政府往哪裡去找?

資源匱乏是今天中港兩地互不相讓的根本因由。特區政府不重視盡力化解兩地文化差異所產生之問題,卻繼續製造分化,建設對立,是愚不可及的政治心態。令人吃驚的是,兩位建制派參選人對此問題卻似乎是完全視而不見、聽而不聞。那麼下屆政府將如何收拾這中港兩地對立的嚴重問題?天曉得!

2 comments:

Frankie Fook-lun Leung said...

The fact they are chinese is irrelevant. The mainlanders will say why do you allow Filipina madis to acquire residence and have all the benefits of a bona fide resident while reject fellow compatriots. You adopt a very legalistic reasoning which is sensible and admirable. However, when one considers blood relationship, you can throw rationality out of the window. At least that is mainland logic with chinese characteristics.

Frankie Fook-lun Leung said...

More Chinese were killed by their fellow Chinese than by any other foreign nationals. Thank you, Chairman Mao Tse-tung. Millions of Chinese died by starvation and other causes such as the Cultural Revolution. I don't like my blood.