Friday, October 24, 2008

年青人與政治


年青人與政治

昨天分別見了一些中學生和大學生。不約而同,我們都談到年青人對政治不感興趣的問題。其實年青人以至香港人對政治的定義均有一種狹義的看法。人是羣體動物,而人在社會相處需要一套定律和處理的機制,這便是政府的來源而政治便是政府運作的軟件。正如孔子所說此乃衆人之事,只要你生存於社會,你便應關心。與年青人相關的議題多的是,你們的意見都是重要的!
你們覺得施政報告有照顧到年青人的需求嗎?你們應如何表達你們關注的訴求?你們覺得我在這方面如何可以幫助年青人?
讓我們就這議題展開討論。

12 comments:

pennychau said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Smallville said...

我係大陸的,在香港論壇潛水幾年,人地越罵得你越勁,反而越覺得你地幾好。
無泄氣,繼續努力。

Anonymous said...

我前幾年一直係你的支持者,但到了今年年中,我開始懷疑應否繼續支持你。
原因非常簡單:你好像變質了..
我係將軍澳的居民,今年年頭遇上了一些麻煩,於是便到你的地區辦事處求助,起初看到那個職員的時候,真的感到不妙,心想:她最多不過20歲,這個小女孩真的幫到我嗎? 好在她的辦事能力真的不錯,效率也很高,很快便解決了我的麻煩。心裡不禁暗暗佩服你知人善任的能力,因為一般人不會請一位這麼年輕的女孩做地區工作吧。
到了今年的年中,我朋友亦遇上同樣的問題,於是我便叫他到你的辨事處求助。過了一星期左右,我的朋友打電話找我,正當我想問他那件事的進展如何,他已在罵我為何叫他到一個這樣「廢」的辦事處求助,那個職員根本完全沒有 follow 過他的 case...我初初也不明白才幾個月,為何轉變那麼大?於是我致電你的辦事處,最後才知道那位女孩已經離職,之後我去問了一些街坊才知道那位女孩原來只是 part-time。但我覺得一個辦事能力高的part-time,總比一個無能的全職好吧..我真的有點後悔當時在那女孩面前稱讚你。
但最令人心痛的是,你的職員在競選時的表現,你有一個女職員竟然指責我們這些街坊老,所以沒有能力幫你助選!那一刻我真的不禁問:為何你會變成這樣...?

Anonymous said...

阿湯大律師...我一向都好尊重律師...尤其係大律師...因為必定要付出好大努力才可以當上大律師...但你嘅所作所為真係丟晒所有律師嘅架...男人老狗成個女人咁...又小家...又小器...為咗唔想提黃毓民...你竟然話生果金問題上最大功勞是民建聯???你有冇再無恥d呀???如果唔係仲有一點尊重你嘅律師專業...我真係好想用粗口問到你!!!我想話比你知...而家好多好多...係真係好多香港市民好buy社民連嘅表現...佢地嘅每個舉動都讓市民感覺佢地真係攞個心出嚟幫香港人...而家香港政府嘅不堪相信你都有眼睇...如果冇黃毓民...長毛佢地嘅公民抗命...你覺得政府會改變嗎????没有抗爭...那有改變...係而家好多香港人嘅心聲!!!有句話你會好唔啱聽...但係事實...而家唔係靠社民連去抗爭...唔通靠你地呢班只係識坐喺度嗌幾句反對...但最後又係妥協嘅公民黨嗎???我覺得你地不如早d同民建聯合併啦...唔好再喺度欺騙香港人喇...希望呢篇嘢唔會咁快俾你刪除啦...講完!!!

Anonymous said...

請各位再聽清楚湯先生的訪問: http://www.sendspace.com/file/rruhi1
,他從來沒有說過「生果金問題最大功勞是民建聯,同毓民無關」,這是李慧玲小姐引說的;她更說,不是因為那掟焦事件嗎?而湯先生只是說不認同掟焦的事而已!
為何所有說話,都是只取其一少部份,而沒有去聽其意思呢!湯先生只是說:曾特首之所以軟化立場,就是因為連保皇黨都不支持他,所以,也順道說,民建聯以後應多多聽取民意。這有什麼錯呢!在他的訪問中,他並沒有提過黃毓民先生!其實,就算你們是黃毓民先生的支持者,也應冷靜面對問題,不應盲從附和!我其實也很尊重黃毓民先生,但卻不會胡亂去指責和他政見不同的人!民主是可以包容不同的意見和聲音!

Anonymous said...

前文後理,大意係湯家驊自命尋日已經知道曾蔭權會讓步,
因為民建聯副主席譚耀宗發言轟曾蔭權不該。
湯家驊話,
曾蔭權只有民建聯撐,如果連民建聯都唔撐,佢唔後退都唔得。
只係覺得曾蔭權會找下台階好讓自己有顏面下台,怎樣也想不到那麼快。

批評曾蔭權永遠都要被逼到牆角先肯讓步。
當特首明白民建聯(都因為民意)也不會盲目支持佢,
咁大概曾蔭權先肯認真面對民意。

[大約第5分鐘左右]

之後,
李慧玲用娛樂版記者的本色去挑撥:
「咁即係歸於民建聯,而唔係黃毓民o個三隻蕉。」

湯家驊答:
「對唔住,我答案唔係咁啦。曾特首把口講視民意如浮雲,實際就好緊張。」

Tony Liu, Los Angeles said...

Visiting the Statue of Liberty does not make you an expert of democracy. If democracy was the Pacific Ocean, you would not get wet even if you fell into it. The Communist Party would be the ruling party by now (if not already) if HK has more people such as you in the government.

The Fruit Allowance victory is the sole achievement of Mr. Wong Yuk Man. Everybody, except you, could see it. Deprive of his achievement only further lessens your credibility.

You are pathetic and shameless!

Samuel said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
waikikisam said...

I think you are referring to the 'banana' incident. I won't encourage such action; on the other hand, I am not against it when it is deemed necessary. What is really sad is that you have to use extraordinary means to get thru' to this dumb and deaf government.

Anonymous said...

Regardless of most of you think that the $1000 is what Yuk Man and Long Hair or (LSD)'s work, this has nothing to do with Ronny Tong's interview. He just said he did not agree with what Lee Wai Ling referred! Please be a little bit fair.

Ronny Tong said...

歡迎你們的批評,但這裏是不容許語言暴力的。請見諒!

Anonymous said...

Hahahaha come on people, I appreciate rational discussion and I really think irrational discussion, blind support and disrespect is not of the qualities which any HK person should possess. The truth is out there so obvious. I just don't understand why this kind of blind support for LSD can be the motivation for anyone to attack the others irrationally. Help.