沒錯，儘管我們自小每天也受教育制度的薰陶、受宗教信仰 的游說，甚至受小說、電影及電視的耳濡目染，我們的社會，特別是政治圈子還是充塞著只求結果、不擇手段的人。我不敢斷言他們是邪，也不願視以正當手法爭取 達到目標者為正，但很大的分別是他們用的手法不為我們所認同。可惜成功的卻往往是他們。有人說法律與規限是對奉公守法者的束縛和懲罰，卻亦是罔顧法紀、只 求達標者的工具和藉口。也許他們的成功正是難以忽視的社會教材，是給想走上歪路者的鼓勵！邪必勝正，我們是鬥不過他們的！
但社會還是有不接 受現實，如我的一群。每當處於下風時，我們便安慰自己：邪不能勝正！終有一天，我們會平反敗局！總有一天，公義會得以彰顯！但每當夜闌人靜時，我不得不承 認，這一天實在等得太久了！或許這也怪不了誰。這可能只是人生常態。《很久以前》的電視劇還沒有播完，但可以肯定結局必然是大團圓。這正是創作藝術與現實 生活的分別。也許我們正需要這些超現實的精神食糧，令我們有能力靜候正義得以彰顯的那一天！
5 comments:
I don't quite understand why you need to introduce a religious element into your argument. Would you argument be just as good and valid without that religious undertone?
I read the H K Bar Association's press release on appointment of Chinese nationals to be judges. The Beijing authorities have already written off what the H K Bar Association as a subversive and pro-colonial government institution. I think China is going to induce the Law Society allowing law firms to form partnership with Mainland law firm in order to united-front them.
Lau Nei Keung was using my arguments in the articles I sent you. Read them.
why your articles are no longer displayed in the civic party web site?
Global Times in Beijing commenting on Chinese University of Hong Kong's research showing that China is interfering with H K's academic freedom.
Post a Comment